Rethinking Confraternities Within Higher Institutions in Nigeria: A Case for Registration, Reform, and National Unity

 By Dr. Nana Akaeze and Dr. Chris Akaeze

A Joint Reflection for The Awake Voice

Date: June 1^st, 2025

Abstract

Confraternities in Nigerian tertiary institutions are commonly associated with violence and secrecy, overshadowing their origins in civic activism, academic excellence, and brotherhood. This perspective challenges prevailing narratives by arguing for a shift from suppression to structured reform and engagement. Drawing from the historical evolution of groups like the Pyrates and Buccaneers Confraternities, the study highlights their civic roles in youth mentorship, health outreach, and interethnic solidarity. In an era marked by ethnic tension, misinformation, and digital radicalization, the loyalty frameworks within these groups have helped mitigate tribal conflicts and maintain democratic stability. This perspective proposes policy responses, including government regulation, civic reorientation, and the establishment of oversight mechanisms. If reformed and integrated, confraternities can function as grassroots agents of peacebuilding, social accountability, and national cohesion in Nigeria’s fragile democracy.

Introduction

Confraternities in Nigeria, commonly referred to as cult groups, have long been perceived as synonymous with violence, lawlessness, and criminality, especially within tertiary institutions. Confraternities in Nigeria, often labeled as cult groups, have historically been associated with violence, lawlessness, and criminal activities, particularly within higher education institutions. In the Nigerian context, the term 'cultism' refers to both violent and nonviolent actions perpetrated by secret campus cults, societies, or fraternities (Nnam et al., 2022). Initially, a student-driven subculture within universities, cultism has evolved and spread beyond tertiary institutions into secondary schools and public spaces since the late 1990s. This expansion has intensified concerns due to its persistence and increasingly pervasive nature (Nnam, 2014; Ajitoni & Olaniyan, 2018; Alumona & Amusan, 2019).

As noted by Nnam (2014a), the adverse impact of secret cults now extends throughout Nigerian society, infiltrating environments such as schools, homes, places of worship, and even custodial institutions. He warned that “nowhere is safe—virtually everyone is a potential victim of cultism” (p. 179). With cult-related violence becoming alarmingly widespread, the issue has garnered significant attention from both policymakers and researchers (Nnam et al., 2022).

This perspective, while not unfounded, obscures a more complex reality. Beneath the surface of notoriety lies a network of brotherhoods with deep-rooted structures, ideologies, and influence that, if reformed and harnessed, could serve as a stabilizing force in Nigeria’s fractious socio-political landscape. Beneath the surface of notoriety lies a network of brotherhoods with deep-rooted structures, ideologies, and influence that, if reformed and harnessed, could serve as a stabilizing force in Nigeria’s fractious socio-political landscape.

One of the most illustrative examples of such transformation is the National Association of Seadogs (NAS), also known as the Pyrates Confraternity (PC), which was founded in 1952 by Wole Soyinka and other undergraduates at the University of Ibadan (National Association of Seadogs, n.d; Udoh, & Ikezu, 2015). The group’s foundational values emphasized anti-corruption, human rights, and social justice, and it has evolved into a civic-minded organization that operates openly with registered chapters across Nigeria and in the diaspora. Similarly, the Buccaneers Association of Nigeria (BAN), which can be described as an offshoot of the Buccaneers confraternity, a breakaway group from the PC (Denga, 1986; Udoh & Ikezu, 2015).

The BC founded by another erudite scholar late professor Bolaji Carew also traces its roots to the university system from university of Ibadan as its origin and has grown into a fraternal body that emphasizes solidarity and collective well-being, often captured in its motto, Brother deliver your brother; “No brother should be left behind and others such as Omoluwabi.” Both groups, alongside others like the Neo-Black movement of Africa (also known as Black Axe), which emerged from the University of Benin in Edo State, and the National Association of Air Lords, have made concerted efforts to de-emphasize religious, ethnic, and tribal affiliations within their ranks. Members are drawn from diverse backgrounds and are bonded by shared rituals, values, and commitment to mutual upliftment and civic engagement.

These confraternities have organized health drives, scholarship programs, anti-drug campaigns, and community development projects in recent years. For instance, public health outreach programs led by some Pyrates and Buccaneers chapters have supported underserved communities with free screenings and medical care. Moreover, many alumni of these associations have assumed leadership roles in law, medicine, education, and public service, mentoring younger members and guiding them away from violent extremism or sectarian politics. Their continued evolution into socially responsible networks suggests a path for reform, one that aligns fraternity with national development and youth empowerment. This perspective argues that the Nigerian government must go beyond outlawing confraternities and instead explore frameworks for their registration, regulation, and civic re-orientation (Rotimi, 2005).

Reframing the Approach: Regulation Over Repression

While the Nigerian government has historically responded to confraternity violence with prohibition and criminalization, this strategy has largely failed to curb their influence or activities. Instead, it has driven many of these organizations underground, where they become harder to monitor and more susceptible to radicalization and criminality. As Rotimi (2005) argues, a more constructive approach would be to develop frameworks for the registration, regulation, and civic re-orientation of confraternities. By legally registering these groups, the government can introduce transparency, ensuring that their leadership structures, purposes, and operations are documented and subject to public oversight. This openness reduces the appeal of secrecy, which often enables illegal activity. Moreover, regulation provides an opportunity to reduce criminal behavior by enforcing codes of conduct, setting legal boundaries, and identifying rogue elements that exploit these networks for violence or extortion. Regulation also encourages accountability, both to legal institutions and to society at large. When confraternities are brought under a formal regulatory structure, they are more likely to reform internal practices, resolve conflicts constructively, and develop community-facing initiatives. In doing so, they can begin to reclaim legitimacy as cultural or social organizations. Importantly, this shift also fosters a sense of belonging among youths who are often drawn to confraternities in search of identity, purpose, and empowerment. Rather than alienate these young people, a civic re-orientation strategy would engage them positively, providing pathways for leadership, mentorship, and service within the framework of national development goals.

Reframing the Approach: Regulation Over Repression

While the Nigerian government has historically responded to confraternity violence with prohibition and criminalization, this strategy has largely failed to curb their influence or activities. Instead, it has driven many of these organizations underground, where they become more complex to monitor and more susceptible to radicalization and criminality. As Rotimi (2005) argues, a more constructive approach would be to develop frameworks for the registration, regulation, and civic re-orientation of confraternities. By legally registering these groups, the government can introduce transparency, ensuring that their leadership structures, purposes, and operations are documented and subject to public oversight. This openness reduces the appeal of secrecy, which often enables illegal activity.

Moreover, regulation provides an opportunity to reduce criminal behavior by enforcing codes of conduct, setting legal boundaries, and identifying rogue elements that exploit these networks for violence or extortion. Regulation also encourages accountability, both to legal institutions and to society at large. When confraternities are brought under a formal regulatory structure, they are more likely to reform internal practices, resolve conflicts constructively, and develop community-facing initiatives. In doing so, they can begin to reclaim legitimacy as cultural or social organizations. Importantly, this shift also fosters a sense of belonging among young people who are often drawn to confraternities in search of identity, purpose, and empowerment. Rather than alienate these young people, a civic re-orientation strategy would engage them positively, providing pathways for leadership, mentorship, and service within the framework of national development goals.

Why Cultism Persists on Campuses Despite Government Crackdowns

Confraternities in Nigerian higher institutions, originally founded on ideals of academic excellence, civic responsibility, and anti-colonial solidarity (Bergman, 2016; Cohen, 2021), have increasingly become associated with secrecy, violence, and criminality. The shift from intellectual brotherhood to aggressive cult behavior has fueled widespread fear, particularly due to their involvement in violent rivalries, extortion, and political manipulation on campuses. Government crackdowns and punitive policies, such as criminalization and mass expulsions, have largely failed, pushing these groups further underground and reinforcing their notoriety. Meanwhile, the deeper structural drivers of cultism—youth unemployment, lack of civic engagement, identity crises, and systemic neglect—remain unaddressed. Despite their current reputation, many confraternities still maintain internal values of loyalty, discipline, and mutual support that, if properly regulated, could be redirected toward national unity and youth empowerment. However, the absence of a coordinated reform strategy has left these organizations in a state of legal and moral limbo, exacerbating their negative influence and hindering their transformative potential.

Balancing Regulation with Safeguards

While the call for registering and reorienting confraternities offers a pragmatic path forward, it must be accompanied by well-designed safeguards to prevent abuse, misuse, or the legitimization of harmful practices. Regulation is not an endorsement of past violence; it is a strategy to dismantle the structures that allow such behavior to persist in the shadows. A balanced framework would involve clear criteria for registration, including documented codes of conduct, transparent leadership structures, regular reporting, and compliance with national laws and university policies. Oversight bodies—comprising educators, civil society leaders, and legal experts—could monitor registered groups to ensure that civic re-orientation remains central to their activities.

Additionally, registration must be accompanied by enforcement mechanisms that can revoke recognition if a group reverts to violence or secrecy. This ensures that civic engagement is not only encouraged but also tied to measurable standards of accountability and public benefit. By pairing regulations with firm boundaries, the government can strike a balance between civic inclusion and institutional responsibility. This approach avoids the binary of total repression or unchecked freedom, instead building a platform where transformation is possible within limits that protect the public and uphold justice.

The Backstory of Campus Fraternities in Nigeria

Confraternities in Nigeria originated as elite student organizations founded on noble ideals. The first, the Pyrates Confraternity, was established in the 1950s by Wole Soyinka and six other students at the University College, Ibadan, to promote academic excellence, social justice, and leadership (Adegbenro, 2023; Rotimi, 2005). Initially, these organizations operated peacefully, serving as platforms for critical discourse and civic activism. According to Adegbenro (2023), the Pyrates maintained a non-violent stance until 1968, when some splinter factions began to adopt secrecy and violence, altering the original vision. The transformation of confraternities into rival factions associated with criminality, political manipulation, and campus violence marked a shift in their societal role (Rotimi, 2005). Ogunade (2005) defines secret cults as closed communities of individuals committed to exclusive ideologies. Over time, confraternities evolved into secretive and sometimes violent groups; yet, many retained their foundational principles of solidarity, mutual support, and service values, which could still contribute to national unity if harnessed appropriately (Rotimi, 2005; Adegbenro, 2023).

Students join these groups for varied reasons. Adewale (2005) notes that motivations range from ego inflation and self-defense to financial support and emotional connection. For some youths, confraternities offer a sense of belonging and purpose, especially in emotionally challenging environments. Despite the degeneration of some confraternities into violent entities, systemic failures also contributed to the crisis. The lack of official regulation meant these groups operated beyond the oversight of university administrations. Though vice-chancellors were empowered to suspend members, the absence of consistent enforcement allowed violence to escalate. Following the tragic killing of students at Obafemi Awolowo University in 1999, President Obasanjo initiated a crackdown, including expulsions and monetary rewards for renunciations. However, these actions were criticized as “inadequate” and “half-hearted,” with a World Bank report deeming them “ineffective” (Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada, 2005).

The Secret Cult and Secret Society Prohibition Bill, introduced in 2001, aimed to criminalize cult activity, but weak enforcement undermined its impact. By 2004, reports of government inaction and even complicity surfaced, suggesting deeper structural issues (Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada, 2005). As Fayokun (2011) adds, although federal authorities mandated universities to eliminate cultism, enforcement remained superficial. Today, some confraternities have morphed into criminal gangs engaging in extortion, kidnapping, and violent crimes. Despite numerous suppression campaigns, many cults continue to operate clandestinely within Nigerian universities, highlighting the persistent and complex nature of the cultism challenge (Adegbenro, 2023; Fayokun, 2011).

The Stabilizing Potential of Brotherhood

Members of confraternities or cult-like groups are often encouraged to develop unwavering faith in the organization and its mission (Kern & Jungbauer, 2022). The driving purpose behind such groups may be religious, philosophical, or rooted in a desire to address pressing societal issues (Meyer, 2016). Functioning as collective entities, these groups rely heavily on shared commitment, which in turn fosters strong internal bonds and a deep sense of social connectedness among members (Best et al., 2018; Kern & Jungbauer, 2022).

A key psychological mechanism underlying this dynamic is deindividuation—the process by which individuals gradually lose their self-awareness and personal identity, adopting instead a collective identity aligned with the group’s values and mission (Kern & Jungbauer, 2022). This transformation reinforces conformity and group loyalty, making members more responsive to internal norms and resistant to external influence.

A case in point is the Buccaneers Confraternity (Sea Lords), which upholds principles such as “One for all, all for one” and “No brother should be left behind.” These ideals cultivate a sense of brotherhood that transcends ethnic and religious boundaries. In a nation increasingly fragmented by regional separatist movements—ranging from IPOB in the Southeast to the Oduduwa Republic in the Southwest and Arewa Youths in the North—such confraternities provide a unique platform for interethnic unity (Chukwurah & Durueke, 2020).

Members often intervene within their ranks to deter radicalization and ethnic violence, choosing allegiance to their fraternal ideals over divisive political ideologies. Bonds of brotherhood, although not without flaws, have made significant contributions to preventing broader national conflicts by promoting cross-cutting affiliations among youth across diverse cultural and regional lines. Cross-cutting memberships can foster greater tolerance and promote broader, more inclusive forms of group loyalty (Brewer, 1999).

Brotherhood as a Bridge: Building Cross-Cultural Solidarity

In a country as diverse and fragmented as Nigeria, the power of fraternal bonds to transcend ethnic and regional divides cannot be overlooked. While confraternities are often criticized for their violent offshoots, many members actively work within their ranks to discourage radicalization and ethnic conflict. These internal interventions demonstrate a form of self-regulation, where loyalty to shared values of brotherhood outweighs allegiance to polarizing political ideologies. Such dynamics foster what Brewer (1999) describes as “cross-cutting group memberships,” which are crucial for cultivating tolerance and bridging divides. When individuals belong to networks that span cultural and geographic boundaries, they are more likely to develop inclusive identities and reduce hostility toward “out-groups.” In this way, despite their flaws, confraternities can offer a model for grassroots unity, providing young people with a common platform that emphasizes solidarity, mutual respect, and collective responsibility across Nigeria’s complex social fabric.

Policy Implications: Harnessing Fraternal Bonds for National Unity

Given the demonstrated capacity of confraternities to foster cross-cultural solidarity, national policy should shift its approach from suppression to strategic engagement. Rather than treating these groups solely as security threats, government institutions, civil society organizations, and educational bodies must recognize and formalize their potential role in peacebuilding and social cohesion. Programs aimed at youth inclusion, leadership training, and civic education can be co-developed with reformed confraternity networks, positioning them as partners in addressing national disunity and youth disenfranchisement.

By integrating confraternal platforms into broader youth policy frameworks—such as national service programs, anti-violence campaigns, and community development initiatives—government stakeholders can tap into their existing influence while also ensuring greater accountability and transparency. Cross-cultural events, inter-fraternity dialogues, and conflict mediation initiatives led by vetted members can serve as vehicles for spreading tolerance, civic responsibility, and national pride.

Ultimately, a policy that reflects both the risks and the unrealized potential of these networks will be better equipped to transform them from sources of division into instruments of national integration and peace.

Why the Government Must Engage

The influence of confraternities in Nigeria extends well beyond the walls of tertiary institutions. Many of their members hold prominent positions in business, civil society, security agencies, and academia. Their allegiance to brotherhood ethics often shapes their professional behavior and interpersonal relationships (Brewer, 1999). Ignoring the existence of such an expansive and structured network may allow its more dangerous and violent elements to dominate the narrative unchecked. Rather than persisting with suppressive strategies, the Nigerian government should adopt a more constructive and reform-oriented approach. A foundational step is to establish a national registry of confraternities, ensuring transparency and enabling the state to monitor their activities. A regulatory body, ideally under the Ministry of Youth or the Ministry of Education, should be tasked with overseeing their operations, enforcing accountability, and providing guidance.

Additionally, civic reorientation programs must be made mandatory for all registered groups. These programs should emphasize non-violence, ethical leadership, and national unity. According to Martini et al. (2023), civic engagement promotes emotional regulation, empowerment, and increased community involvement among young people. It also serves as a protective mechanism for individuals at risk and contributes to the formation of a positive identity. Moreover, these reforms must protect the cultural and fraternal identities of these groups. Respecting their foundational values while demanding ethical conduct and transparency creates a balanced pathway toward integration and transformation (Ikezu & Chinwe, 2015).

Finally, engaging confraternities through structured dialogue supports the broader goals of social accountability. As Fox (2015) explains, social accountability involves citizen engagement that enhances state responsiveness, especially in contexts where representative government mechanisms are weak. This approach bolsters institutional performance and provides youth with a political and civic voice. Ackerman (2004) emphasizes that, unlike electoral accountability, social accountability operates through direct citizen engagement, making it particularly relevant in fragile democracies. Structured engagement with confraternities, therefore, aligns with international best practices in youth reform and participatory governance (Adebanwi, 2009; Fox, 2015).

Confraternity Membership Amid Misinformation and Tension

While confraternities in Nigeria are often criticized for being associated with violence and secrecy (Okwu, 2006), it is essential to consider a more balanced perspective, particularly their significant contribution to Nigeria’s democratic stability during a period of ethnic division and misinformation. In today’s digital era, social media frequently spreads conspiracy theories, fake news, and ethnic hatred (Enders et al., 2023). However, confraternities have acted as unexpected stabilizers in this environment. One of their most powerful features is the deep sense of loyalty and solidarity among members. This loyalty is not based on tribe or religion, but on shared values and brotherhood.

Many confraternities, such as the Pyrates and Buccaneers, promote national unity through slogans like “No friend, no foe” and “No brother should be left behind.” These messages encourage members to work together regardless of ethnicity or region, helping to reduce tribalism and promote cross-cultural relationships. Group loyalty often demands that members follow group rules, respect leaders, and prioritize the goals of the organization, even at personal cost (Brewer & Brown, 1998; Zdaniuk & Levine, 2001). This strong commitment builds social cohesion and makes members less likely to spread hate or incite violence.

During times of political tension, confraternity members have played informal roles as peacekeepers within their communities, especially on social media. Instead of fueling tribal conflict, they often advise against hateful posts and promote calm and unity. Their wide network across regions allows them to diffuse tensions before they escalate. Unlike countries such as South Sudan or the Democratic Republic of Congo, where youth militias have driven civil wars, Nigeria’s confraternities—despite their controversial nature—have helped prevent a similar collapse (Ferguson, 2018). Their structure, shared rituals, and group identity create a sense of purpose and discipline that discourages ethnically driven violence. Moreover, their involvement in elections, protests, and civic discussions—although sometimes debated—shows a real interest in shaping Nigeria’s future. As Nigeria faces new democratic challenges in the age of social media, these groups, with their cross-ethnic unity and influence, can serve as important partners in preserving peace, promoting understanding, and supporting democratic growth.

Challenges and Safeguards

Undeniably, concerns about the violent legacy of certain confraternities must not be dismissed. Granting unchecked recognition risks empowering criminal factions. Violence, as observed by Dahlberg and Mercy (2009), should be viewed through public health lens—understood as behavior shaped by contextual, biological, systemic, environmental, and social stressors. The World Health Organization (n.d.) defines violence as “the intentional use of physical force or power, threatened or actual, against oneself, another person, or against a group or community, which either results in or has a high likelihood of resulting in injury, death, psychological harm, maldevelopment, or deprivation.”

Importantly, trauma-informed perspectives reframe violent behavior not as evidence of inherently “bad” individuals, but as adverse health outcomes influenced by multiple risk factors (Center for Nonviolence and Social Justice, n.d.). These insights underscore the need for preventive, rather than purely punitive, interventions. Structured engagement presents an opportunity to impose safeguards. By formally recognizing only confraternities that commit to civic responsibility and non-violence, the government can isolate rogue factions. Implementing behavioral contracts, public charters, and annual reporting standards offers tools to ensure accountability. Such measures are effective; research shows that behavioral contracts—used in various populations—help reinforce desired conduct by clearly defining expectations and linking them to outcomes (Edgemon et al., 2021; Cooper et al., 2019).

Fraternities and Redirecting Youth Allegiances

Fraternities in Nigerian higher institutions have undergone a significant transformation. Once established to promote learning, social justice, and moral development, many confraternities have deviated from their founding goals. Today, they are often associated with secrecy, violence, and extreme ideologies. Some have even evolved into competitive factions engaging in violent clashes—referred to as "supremacy wars"—over colors, territory, and influence on campuses (Bergman, 2016; Cohen, 2021). However, this strong sense of group loyalty and identity is not limited to fraternities alone. It reflects a broader culture among Nigerian youth who often express deep allegiance to various external affiliations, such as religious sects, ethnic groups, or foreign football clubs. This rigid loyalty sometimes leads to physical confrontations, especially around sporting rivalries (Adeyemi, 2017). These behaviors point to a deeper issue, where group-based identities are shaped by tribalism and binary thinking rather than shared national values.

Interestingly, confraternities—despite their current reputation—still hold potential as platforms for positive social integration. Their transnational and multi-ethnic structures promote bonds that often cross tribal and religious lines (Cohen, 2021). When properly guided, they can serve as inclusive communities that provide youth with a sense of belonging, leadership training, and civic awareness (Marie & Thompson, 2023). Research on shared group identity supports this, showing that when individuals see themselves as part of a larger group, it encourages cooperation and reduces intergroup conflict (Gaertner & Dovidio, 2000). Recent studies have highlighted the importance of bringing together young people from diverse backgrounds to foster a more equitable and inclusive society. Intergroup contact has been shown to encourage collective action for the benefit of disadvantaged groups or broader communities (Selvanathan et al., 2018; Cocco et al., 2022; Rompke et al., 2019). In this context, reformed fraternities can play a vital role in helping students develop a shared identity that transcends ethnic or religious lines.

Unfortunately, past efforts to curb cultism in Nigeria have focused mostly on punishment. In 2001, laws were passed to criminalize secret cult activities, and universities introduced pledges and expulsion policies for students involved in such groups. In some extreme cases, mass prayer sessions and exorcisms were organized by religious leaders to fight cultism (Bergman, 2016). While these efforts show concern, they only address the symptoms, not the root causes, of youth involvement in criminal confraternities. To truly change the narrative, a long-term solution is needed. First, Nigeria’s political environment must be reformed to favor peaceful debate and fair elections over violence and manipulation practices that have historically involved youth groups. Second, confraternities themselves need to be restructured with clear, positive goals that benefit both members and the campus community. Third, universities should invest more in inclusive campus life to provide youth with meaningful alternatives for identity and expression.

Scholars such as Batts et al. (2022) argue that inclusion and engagement are more effective than suppression in addressing marginalized groups. Recognizing this, policymakers should consider allowing confraternities to operate legally under strict ethical and developmental guidelines. There is no reason fraternities should be exempt from legal responsibility. If incorporated, they should follow corporate laws; if not, they should be governed by rules that apply to nonprofit voluntary associations (Neuhoff, 1925). Formal registration of fraternities can also help restore public trust. Legally recognized organizations are more likely to be transparent and accountable, and they are better positioned to secure resources and attract members who are committed to their goals (Assenova & Sorenson, 2017). Registration signals a commitment to follow rules and often reflects well-organized internal systems (Meyer & Rowan, 1977; Hannan et al., 2007). With this legal and social legitimacy, fraternities can access funding, attract skilled leaders, and build stronger ties with the community (Assenova & Sorenson, 2017). In conclusion, confraternities should not be discarded outright, but reimagined and reformed. Moving away from a “ban and blame” approach toward a strategy of regulation, integration, and support offers a more promising path. With proper oversight and constructive leadership, fraternities can help redirect youth allegiances away from division and violence, and toward unity, civic responsibility, and national development.

The Role of Pyrates and Other Confraternities in Cult Violence

Despite decades of image laundering and public rebranding, the Pyrates Confraternity (NAS) and other foremost Nigerian confraternities were not exempt from violent and deviant behaviors. While they are often praised today for intellectual activism and social justice ideals, historical records and independent reports suggest that these groups were deeply involved in violent supremacy clashes that contributed significantly to the cult-related violence that plagues Nigerian campuses today. Bergman (2016) offers a critical perspective on this transformation, noting that the confraternity movement in Nigeria originated in the 1950s with noble ideals reminiscent of those of U.S. fraternities—brotherhood, chivalry, and a rejection of colonial conventions. The Pyrates' early mission was to "fight non-violently but intellectually" and to challenge tribalism and elitism. Their creed promoted resistance to societal convention, and members were described as "the cleanest, brightest, and most politically conscious students on campus" (Bergman, 2016).

However, within two decades, this idealism gave way to brutality. Bergman (2016) documents that by the 1980s and 1990s, these confraternities had become associated with beheadings, murder, prostitution rings, and terror on university campuses. This degeneration from intellectual brotherhood to violent gangs prompts a key question: What caused this drastic shift?

One compelling argument is that these organizations matured out of their violent phase only after their founding leaders secured positions of power and influence, enabling them to register their groups with the government formally. With registration came recognition, structure, and accountability—factors that helped reduce internal violence. Formal status allowed the state to identify leadership and membership, holding them responsible for the actions of their groups. Moreover, the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada (1999) provides documented instances of violence directly involving the Pyrates and their rival confraternities, long before the later splinter groups emerged. These include:

• A deadly clash on 18 June 1997 between NAS and the Eiye fraternity at Polytechnic Ibadan, leaving two students feared dead (Post Express Wired, 24 June 1997).
• On 6 March 1998, twenty-one students at the Federal College of Education in Abeokuta were denied graduation due to confirmed affiliations with NAS and Eiye groups (Post Express Wired, 13 March 1998).
• A violent confrontation on 13 April 1999 between NAS and the Buccaneers at the University of Calabar resulted in three student deaths (Post Express Wired, 15 April 1999). 

So, the Pyrate confraternity is not innocent, and these events dispel the myth that the Pyrates were completely detached from the violence that engulfed Nigerian campuses. They were active participants and, arguably, pioneers of the supremacy battles that escalated into today’s widespread cult violence. The key distinction is that while many confraternities devolved further into criminality, groups like the Brothers Across Nigeria International (BANI) and NAS, after their formal registrations, have gained legitimacy and structure. This accountability mechanism enabled them to distance themselves from ongoing violence, reposition their image, and engage in civic and intellectual advocacy. However, that transition came after years of violent dominance, not in place of it.

The Case for Government-Mandated Registration of Fraternities in Nigeria

Governor Monday Okpebholo of Edo State recently made a strong move to fight cult violence by signing the Secret Cult and Similar Activities (Prohibition) Law, 2025. This law includes a 21-year jail sentence for cult members and their sponsors. It also allows the government to destroy buildings used to support cult activities (The Nation, 2025). This is a bold and commendable effort to address the long-standing danger cult groups pose to students and the wider community.

However, while this kind of punishment may be well-meaning, it is not enough to permanently stop cult violence. Over time, we have seen that without systems that ensure fairness and accountability, such laws can be misused. There is a real risk that if cult members gain political power in the future, they could use these laws to go after their enemies, claiming to be enforcing justice. To avoid this, Nigeria needs long-term reforms that focus on oversight and transparency.

One of the best ways to improve control and reduce violence is to require all fraternities to be officially registered with the government. This would bring these groups into a clear and legal system of monitoring. It would also make it easier to know who leads these groups and who their members are. When there is a record of leadership and membership, it becomes possible to distinguish between honest, civic-minded organizations and violent, criminal groups masquerading as fraternities. This visibility helps stop the hiding and secrecy that often leads to violent actions without consequences.

Official registration would also make leaders more responsible. When fraternity leaders are aware that the government is watching and that they could lose their status or face punishment if their members engage in violent behavior, they are more likely to keep their members in check. They would need to monitor behavior within the group, encourage discipline, and ensure their members follow ethical standards and contribute positively to society. Government registration also opens opportunities for partnerships. These partnerships could help re-educate and redirect fraternities toward more meaningful goals, such as building the nation, developing future leaders, and serving the public—goals that many of these groups once embraced but later abandoned.

Research supports this kind of balanced solution. For example, Eneh (2008) pointed out that to truly stop cultism, we must also fix its root causes like youth unemployment, peer pressure, and lack of moral education. Similarly, Popoola and Alao (2006) argued that fraternal organizations in schools need to be restructured through proper policies and community-based approaches that encourage positive change rather than just punishment.

Registering fraternities formally transforms them from secret, unregulated groups into civic organizations with identifiable leaders, trackable activities, and tangible consequences for misbehavior. It gives the government a straightforward way to oversee its actions and protects the public from violence disguised as brotherhood. By making transparency and accountability the standard, this policy could be a turning point for changing the culture of fraternities in Nigeria, encouraging those who want to build up society and exposing those who choose violence and fear.

Reimagining Fraternal Networks for a Stronger Nigeria

Nigeria’s history with confraternities is complex, marked by both profound promise and deep concern. While the darker legacies of violence and secrecy cannot be ignored, neither should we overlook the capacity of these groups to build cross-cultural bridges, foster civic consciousness, and promote a sense of belonging among youth. Current approaches that rely exclusively on criminalization have not only failed to eliminate the challenges but have deepened mistrust and driven these networks further underground.

A coordinated reform strategy rooted in registration, civic re-orientation, and structured engagement offers a more pragmatic and hopeful alternative. When supported by thoughtful policy, fraternal organizations can evolve into platforms for unity rather than division, leadership rather than rebellion, and progress rather than instability. Harnessing their influence through accountability, mentorship, and peacebuilding efforts can help redirect youth energy toward constructive nation-building.

The path forward demands vision, courage, and collaboration. However, if Nigeria is to overcome its fragmented present and move toward a more unified and inclusive future, it must begin by transforming its approach, not by erasing confraternities, but by reimagining their role in serving the common good.

Conclusion

Nigeria stands at a crossroads where internal divisions, ethnic bigotry, and the rapid spread of misinformation increasingly threaten national unity. However, amid this volatility, youth confraternities—often dismissed as agents of unrest—have demonstrated surprising potential as stabilizing forces. Their strong internal loyalty structures and rejection of tribalism have enabled them to serve as buffers against the kind of ethnically charged violence that has led to prolonged conflict in countries like South Sudan and the Democratic Republic of Congo. As Young (1990) emphasizes in her framework of the Five Faces of Oppression, marginalization, cultural imperialism, and powerlessness remain major barriers to inclusive engagement. These are often reinforced by institutional practices such as excluding local voices, failing to honor civic contributions, and perpetuating microaggressions (Batts et al., 2022). In contrast, many confraternities actively foster cross-ethnic bonds, discourage online radicalization, and promote unity through peer influence, offering a unique grassroots infrastructure for civic cohesion.

As seen in the evolution of groups like the National Association of Seadogs (NAS) and Brothers Across Nigeria International (BANI), the formalization and oversight of fraternities can reduce violent behavior and promote civic engagement, but only when coupled with structural reforms and active accountability. If these recommendations are implemented thoughtfully, confraternities can be repositioned as partners in peace, leadership development, and social cohesion.

Therefore, rather than defaulting to policies of suppression, the Nigerian government should pursue a deliberate strategy of engagement and reform. This shift is not about excusing past transgressions but about unlocking a collective potential that can promote youth empowerment, national peace, and democratic resilience in the digital age. This is the transformative shift Nigeria needs to end the cycle of cult violence and channel youth energy into nation-building.

Recommendations

To transform Nigerian confraternities into positive and constructive forces for national development, the government and relevant stakeholders must take deliberate and structured action. Drawing from historical evidence and recent policy efforts, such as Governor Okpebholo’s anti-cultism law and the evolving paths of groups like the National Association of Seadogs (NAS) and Brothers Across Nigeria International (BANI), it is clear that a multi-faceted approach is required to achieve sustainable reform.

First, the Nigerian government should convene a national summit that brings together a wide range of stakeholders. This should include university administrators, security agencies, registered confraternity leaders, student representatives, civil society organizations, and policymakers. The goal of the summit would be to collaboratively design a national framework for the formal registration, regulation, and peaceful transformation of confraternities. Such a dialogue would help distinguish between fraternities that have embraced civic values and those that continue to operate outside the law.

Second, the government should establish an independent body known as the Confraternity Reform and Oversight Commission, or CROC. Ideally housed under the Ministry of Youth Development, this commission would be responsible for issuing operating licenses to registered fraternities, monitoring their activities, and ensuring they comply with national civic and ethical standards. CROC would also maintain a registry of recognized leaders and members, thereby reducing anonymity and promoting accountability within these organizations.

Third, civic re-orientation and leadership development programs should be introduced for members of registered fraternities. These programs should focus on building values such as non-violence, patriotism, ethical leadership, and community service. By promoting positive engagement, these initiatives can help redirect the energy and structure of fraternities toward nation-building and campus peacekeeping.

Fourth, the government must address the root causes of cultism by promoting socio-economic inclusion for young people. This includes expanding access to jobs, vocational and entrepreneurship training, and youth development programs. Providing meaningful opportunities outside the cult system will reduce the appeal of violent confraternities and empower students to pursue more productive paths.

Ultimately, transparency and accountability must be at the core of any reform strategy. Only fraternities that operate openly, abide by legal norms, and commit to ethical standards should be permitted to function. Groups found to be engaging in violence, intimidation, or criminal activity must be deregistered and prosecuted under the law. Leaders must be held accountable for the actions of their members, just as formal recognition must come with the responsibility to uphold peace and order.

If thoughtfully implemented, these recommendations can help shift the public perception of confraternities from being viewed as security threats to becoming partners in promoting peace, leadership, and unity across Nigeria’s diverse campuses and communities. The time to act is now, not only to protect future generations but to reclaim and redirect the power of youth associations for the good of the nation. As seen in the evolution of groups like the NAS and BANI, the formalization and oversight of fraternities can reduce violent behavior and promote civic engagement, but only when coupled with structural reforms and active accountability. If these recommendations are implemented thoughtfully, confraternities can be repositioned as partners in peace, leadership development, and social cohesion. This is the transformative shift Nigeria needs to end the cycle of cult violence and channel youth energy into nation-building.

 

Read. Reflect. Share. Rise.
#TheAwakeVoice #CharacterMatters #LeadWithIntegrity #TruthOverTribes #FaithInAction #JusticeIsPatriotic #ReclaimTheMoralCenter

Cite this blog post as: Akaeze, C., & Akaeze, N. (2025, May 25). Rethinking Confraternities Within Higher Institutions in Nigeria: A Case for Registration, Reform, and National Unity. The Awake Voice. https://theawakevoice.blogspot.com/2025/06/rethinking-confraternities-within.html

About the Authors

Dr. Nana Akaeze and Dr. Chris Akaeze are civic educators, strategists, and thought leaders, co-contributors to The Awake Voice, a platform dedicated to truth, justice, and moral leadership in public life. Together, they write with a shared vision to awaken conscience, inspire principled action, and elevate conversations that strengthen democracy and community.

Their reflections are grounded in faith, scholarship, and a profound commitment to creating a better world for the next generation.

References

Adebanwi, W. (2009). Terror, territoriality, and the struggle for indigeneity and citizenship in Northern Nigeria. Citizenship Studies, 13(4), 349–363.

Adegbenro, G. A. (2023). Cultism Development and Its Sinister Influence in Nigeria Universities, British Journal of Education, Vol.11, Issue 6, pp. 65-75

Adewale, R. (2005). Violence in citadel: The menace of secret cults in Nigeria universities Nordic Journal of African studies, 14(1), 79-98.

Adeyemi O, Kola A (2017). Gone to Stamford Bridge? Influence of Foreign Football and its Digital Coverage on Youths in Abeokuta, Nigeria. J Mass Communicat Journalism 7: 330. doi: 10.4172/2165-7912.1000330

Ackerman, J. (2004). Co-governance for accountability: beyond “exit” and “voice”. World Development, 32(3), 447-463.

Ajitoni, S., & Olaniyan, O. (2018). CAUSES AND PANACEA TO PROBLEM OF CULTISM IN THE NIGERIAN EDUCATION SYSTEM. European Journal of Education Studies, 0. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.1457

Alumona, I. M. & Amusan, L. (2019). Youth Cultism, Crime, and Lethal Violence in Nigerian     Cities. African Renaissance 16 (2), 11 – 29. DOI:https://doi.org/10.31920?2516-    5305/2019/v16n2ai

Assenova, V. A., & Sorenson, O. (2017). Legitimacy and the benefits of firm formalization. Organization Science, 28(5), 804–818. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1146

Batts, H., Joseph, R. & Stoeffler, S. W., (2022) “Addressing Engagement Suppression in Black and Brown Racialized Communities”, Social Development Issues 43(3): 3. doi: https://doi.org/10.3998/sdi.2808

Bergman, B. (2016). From Fraternal Brotherhood to Murderous Cult: The Origins and Mutations of Southern Nigeria’s Confraternities from 1953 Onwards," Pursuit - The Journal of Undergraduate Research at The University of Tennessee: Vol. 7 : Iss. 1 , Article 5. https://doi.org/10.7290/pur7twbv

Best, J. V. C, (2018). Cults: A Psychological Perspective. Columbus State University, USA 

Brewer, M. B., & Brown, R. J. (1998). Intergroup relations. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 554–594). McGraw-Hill. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1998-07091-029

 Brewer, M. B. (1999). The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love and outgroup hate? Journal of Social Issues, 55(3), 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00126

Chukwurah, C. C., & Durueke, O. N. (2020). Curbing the Menace of Cultism and Youth Violence in Rivers State. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 25(8), 28–34. https://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jhss/papers/Vol.25-Issue8/Series-10/D2508102834.pdf

COCCO, V., Di Bernardo, G. A., Stathi, S., & Vezzali, L. (2022). Investigating the associations of positive and negative intergroup contact with normative and nonnormative collective action among advantaged group members: The mediating role of common ingroup identity and outgroup morality. TPM: Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 29(1).

Cocco, V. M., Vezzali, L., Kola-Daisi, T. I., & Çakal, H. (2023). The role of common ingroup identity in promoting social change among tribes in Nigeria. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 27(1), 142-157. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302231162038

Cohen, C. (2021, December). Nigerian confraternities: To conquer the world? SciencesPo: Centre de Recherches Internationales (CERI). https://www.sciencespo.fr/ceri/sites/sciencespo.fr.ceri/files/Etude_258%20engl..pdf

Cooper, J.O., Heron, T.E., & Heward, W.L. ((2020). Applied Behavior Analysis, Third Edition. Pearson Education Inc.

Denga D. (1986). An introduction to foundation of education Calabar, Advance publishers and printers.

Edgemon, A. K., Rapp, J. T., Coon, J. C., Cruz‐Khalili, A., Brogan, K. M., & Richling, S. M. (2021). Using behavior contracts to improve behavior of children and adolescents in multiple settings. Behavioral Interventions, 36(1), 271–288. https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.1757

Enders, A. M., Uscinski, J. E., Seelig, M. I., Klofstad, C. A., Wuchty, S., Funchion, J. R., Murthi, M. N., Premaratne, K., & Stoler, J. (2023). The Relationship Between Social Media Use and Beliefs in Conspiracy Theories and Misinformation. Political behavior, 45(2), 781–804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-021-09734-6

Eneh, A. I. (2008). Cultism in the Nigerian educational institutions: Incidence, causes, effects and solutions. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281275497_CULTISM_IN_THE_NIGERIAN_EDUCATIONAL_INSTITUTIONS_INCIDENCE_CAUSES_EFFECTS_AND_SOLUTIONS

Fayokun, K. O. (2011). Campus cultism in Nigeria’s higher education institutions: Origins, development and suggestions for control. Makerere Journal of Higher Education, 3(1), 59–71. https://doi.org/10.4314/majohe.v3i1.6

Ferguson, S. (2018, May 14). Congolese militia groups are recruiting children and youth for combat. UNICEF USA.

Fox, J. A. (2015). Social accountability: What does the evidence really say? World Development, 72, 346–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.03.011

Gaertner S. L., Dovidio J. F. (2000). Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity model. Psychology Press.

Gładysz, E. (Ed.). (2014). The young generation against the threats of the modern world. Studio Poligraficzne Edytorka.

Hannan MT, Pólos L, Carroll GR (2007) Logics of Organization Theory: Audiences, Codes, and Ecologies (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).

Ikezu, U. P., & Chinwe, V. (2015). Causes, Effects and Strategies for Eradicating Cultism among Students in Tertiary Institutions in Nigeria. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(22), 22–28.

Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada. (1999, November 24). Activities of an organization called the Seadogs (Sea Dogs) (National Association of Seadogs: NAS), also known as the Pyrates Confraternity [NGA33253.E]. https://www.ecoi.net/en/file/local/1049746/291841_en.html

Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada. (2005, February 23). Responses to information requests (RIRs): NGA43278.E. https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/eoir/legacy/2013/12/18/NGA43278.E.pdf

Kern, C., & Jungbauer, J. (2022). Long-Term Effects of a Cult Childhood on Attachment, Intimacy, and Close Relationships: Results of an In-Depth Interview Study. Clinical Social Work Journal, 50(2), 207–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-020-00773-w

Marie, J., & Thompson, N. (2023). Stepping across the divide: Exploring how culturally based fraternities and sororities influence African-born members’ navigation of U.S. higher education, race, and racism. Journal of Sorority and Fraternity Life Research and Practice, 18(2), Article 6. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/oracle/vol18/iss2/6

Martini, M., Rollero, C., Rizzo, M., Di Carlo, S., De Piccoli, N., & Fedi, A. (2023). Educating Youth to Civic Engagement for Social Justice: Evaluation of a Secondary School Project. Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 13(8), 650. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13080650

Meyer JW, Rowan B (1977) Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. Amer. J. Sociol. 83(2):340–363.

Meyer, H. (2022, September 5). “What makes a cult a cult?” The Tennessean. https://www.tennessean.com/story/news/religion/2016/09/15/what-makes-cult-cult/90377532/.

National Association of Seadogs. (n.d.). History of NAS. https://www.nas-int.org/history-of-nas/

Neuhoff, C. S. (1925). The legal status of fraternities. St. Louis Law Review, 11(1), 30–37. https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_lawreview/vol11/iss1/5

Nnam, M. U. (2014). Secret cult menace in Nigeria within the context of social structure and political economy: A critical analysis. International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences, 9(2), 171–180. https://ijcjs.com/menu-script/index.php/ijcjs/article/view/139

Nnam, M. U., Owan, E. J., Otu, M. S., Okechukwu, G.-P., Eteng, M. J., Offu, P., & Obasi, C. O. (2022). ‘…Even correctional institutions are not safe’: A qualitative study of campus secret cults/cultism among selected inmates in a custodial centre. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 68, 100509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2021.100509

Ogunade, R. (2005). Secret societies and cult activities in Nigeria tertiary institution in leading issues in general studies, Ilorin: University of Ilorin Press

Okwu, O. J. (2006). A critique of students’ vices and the effect on quality of graduates of Nigerian tertiary institutions. Journal of Social Sciences, 12(3): 193-198

Popoola, B. I., & Alao, K. A. (2006). Secret cults in Nigerian institutions of higher learning: Need for a radical intervention programme. Journal of School Violence, 5(2), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.1300/J202v05n02_06

Römpke, A. K., Fritsche, I., & Reese, G. (2019). Get together, feel together, act together: International personal contact increases identification with humanity and global collective action. Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology, 3(1), 35-48.

The Nation. (2025, May 17). Edo gov signs secret cult prohibition bill into law, approves 21-year jail term for cultists, sponsors. https://thenationonlineng.net/edo-gov-signs-secret-cult-prohibition-bill-into-law-approves-21-year-jail-term-for-cultists-sponsors

Tropp, L. R., Uluğ, Ö. M., & Uysal, M. S. (2021). How intergroup contact and communication about group differences predict collective action intentions among advantaged groups. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 80, 7-16.

Udoh, V. C., & Ikezu, U. J. M. (2015). Causes, effects and strategies for eradicating cultism among students in tertiary institutions in Nigeria: A case study of Nnamdi Azikiwe University Awka, Anambra State, Nigeria. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(22), 94–99. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1079482.pdf

Rotimi, K. (2005). Violence in the Citadel: The Menace of Secret Cults in the Nigerian Universities. Nordic Journal of African Studies, 14(1), 79–98. https://doi.org/10.53228/njas.v14i1.282

Selvanathan, H. P., Techakesari, P., Tropp, L. R., & Barlow, F. K. (2018). Whites for racial justice: How contact with Black Americans predicts support for collective action among White Americans. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 21(6), 893-912.

Young, I. M. (1990). Five faces of oppression. In I.M. Young (ed.),Justice and the politics of difference (pp. 39–65). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Zdaniuk, B., & Levine, J. M. (2001). Group Loyalty: Impact of Members’ Identification and Contributions. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.2000.1474